Time For John Brummett To Go

Enough already! On America’s birthday John Brummett would have all believe America is but a bastard child of secularists and not born of Providence!

I grow increasingly angry by my having to be subjected to his poorly researched tirades and his inaccurate, un-unique and totally predictable Castro brothers/Hugo Chavez perspective. Have you ever wondered what those “domestic enemies” of America and the Constitution look or sound like? I give you John Brummett.

Building his entire argument that America was not founded as a Christian nation Brummett cites the singular reference used by his kind, the 1797 Treaty of Tripoli. That Treaty included language that was specifically designed to distinguish and separate America from the heretical and heavy-handed so-called “Christian” nations of Europe infamous for their waging of wars. Desperately clinging to this singular reference, Brummett ignores the founding documents of America, the published debates and written volumes of America’s Founders clearly establishing that America was founded as and designed to function as a Christian nation.

Contrast Brummett, who is of no consequence, to John Quincy Adams, 6th US President, son of 2nd US President John Adams, who on July 4, 1821 in a speech to the U.S. House of Representatives said: "The highest glory of the American Revolution was this; it connected, in one indissoluble bond the principles of civil government with the principles of Christianity."

And then we have from John Jay - first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, First President of the United States - preceding George Washington and one of three men most responsible for the US Constitution, this: "Providence has given our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty, as well as privilege and interest, of a Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers."

We even have Supreme Court decisions declaring America to be a Christian nation… and then we have Brummett.

Brummett is a duplicitous, unstudied, shameless and treasonous revisionist while Adams and Jay lived, witnessed and were responsible for making the history Brummett denies and would re-write. Just who has the greater credibility…?

In 1795 Thomas Paine wrote his infamous attack upon Christianity “Age Of Reason” and went from American patriot and hero to being a social outcast. He, like Brummett, practiced the blackest of treasons by attacking the very foundation of America and Brummett, like Paine, should suffer the same consequence.

Enemies of America, both foreign and the domestic, understand fully that if you can destroy the foundation, the rest will collapse. That undermining of America’s foundation, whether deliberate or borne from ignorance, should not be tolerated by those who still love America and should be exposed at every opportunity. America was not founded by cowards and America and its Constitution will not be preserved and protected by apathetic cowards.

I question the wisdom of any business enabling a domestic enemy of the United States, through a paid position, to regularly infect and deceive others. What motive is behind that…?